25-hydroxyvitamin D serum levels in patients with high risk resected melanoma treated in an adjuvant bevacizumab trial.

Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, CB2 0QQ, Oxford, United Kingdom. Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada. Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, CV4 7AL, Coventry, United Kingdom. University of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation Trust, M20 4BX, Manchester, United Kingdom. Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, OX3 7DQ, Oxford, United Kingdom. Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, CB2 0QQ, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, LS9 7TF, Leeds, United Kingdom. Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, CB2 0QQ, Oxford, United Kingdom. mark.middleton@oncology.ox.ac.uk. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, OX3 7LE, Oxford, United Kingdom. mark.middleton@oncology.ox.ac.uk. Cambridge Cancer Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, CB2 0QQ, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

British journal of cancer. 2018;(7):793-800

Abstract

BACKGROUND Studies evaluating a relationship of vitamin D in patients with primary melanoma have consistently identified an inverse correlation with Breslow thickness, but an inconsistent impact on survival. Vitamin D in later stages of melanoma has been less studied. METHODS Vitamin D was measured in serum from 341 patients with resected stage IIB-IIIC melanoma recruited to the AVAST-M adjuvant melanoma randomised trial, collected prior to randomisation, then at 3 and 12 months. Vitamin D levels were compared with patient demographics, known melanoma prognostic factors, disease-free interval (DFI) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 73% patients had stage III melanoma, 32% were enroled (and therefore tested) >1 year after primary melanoma diagnosis. Median pre-randomisation vitamin D level was 56.5 (range 12.6-189.0 nmol/L). Vitamin D levels did not significantly vary over 12 months (p = 0.24). Individual pre-randomisation vitamin D levels did not differ significantly for Breslow thickness, tumour ulceration, or disease stage. Neither did pre-randomisation vitamin D predict for DFI (HR = 0.98 per 10 nmol/L increase; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.04, p = 0.59) or OS (HR = 0.96 per 10 nmol/L increase, 95% CI 0.90-1.03, p = 0.31). For stage II patients, DFI improved with higher pre-randomisation vitamin D levels for those on bevacizumab (HR = 0.74 per 10 nmol nmol/L increase; 95% CI 0.56-0.97), but not for the observation arm (HR = 1.07 per 10 nmol/L increase; 95% CI 0.85-1.34). CONCLUSIONS In this stage II/III melanoma cohort, vitamin D did not correlate with known prognostic markers, nor predict for DFI or OS, but there was some evidence of benefit for patients with stage II disease treated with bevacizumab.

Methodological quality

Metadata